Subject: SVR2001
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:09:18 -0300
From: "SRV2001" <srv2001@fundanet.br>
To: <alberto@dca.fee.unicamp.br>


Prezado(a) Autor(a) do SVR 2001,

Temos a satisfao de informar que o artigo:

RV49: A Component-based Infrastructure for the Coordination of Collaborative 
Activities in Virtual Environments
AUTHOR(S): Raposo et al.



Foi aceito como ARTIGO COMPLETO para ser apresentado no SVR 2001 e
publicado nos Anais. Seguem, em anexo, os pareceres dos revisores.

A verso final dever ser enviada em formato Word, at 06/08/2001, para
o seguinte endereo: srv2001@fundanet.br. 

Ao preparar a verso final, devem ser seguidas as orientaes constantes
do documento "Formato-SVR", que est sendo enviado em anexo.
A incluso do trabalho aceito na Programao e nos Anais do SVR est
condicionada ao seguimento das orientaes de formato.

Lembramos que pelo menos um autor de cada trabalho aceito dever
comparecer ao SVR para apresentao do seu trabalho. Os autores de
trabalhos aceitos devero inscrever-se no SVR at 10/08/2001, de acordo
com as instrues para inscrio no Simpsio, constantes da homepage do
evento: http://www.inf.ufsc.br/info2001/

Agradecemos sua participao e esperamos encontr-lo(a) no SVR 2001 em
Florianpolis.

Tereza G. Kirner

===================================================================

PAPER NUMBER: 49
PAPER TITLE: A Component-Based Infrastructure for the Coordination 
AUTHOR(S): Raposo et al.

Parecer 1
==================================================================
A - Evaluate the PAPER QUALITIES according to the CLASSIFICATION SCALE.

CLASSIFICATION SCALE:
(4) Excelent paper (strong acceptance)
(3) Good Paper (acceptance)   
(2) Regular Paper (weak acceptance)
(1)  Insuficient Paper (reject)

PAPER QUALITIES:
(3) Originality
(3) Relevance
(3) Technical Quality
(2) Presentation
(3) Overal Rating

B - If the paper was rejected as a FULL PAPER, can it be accepted as a POSTER?
(x) Yes
(   ) No

C - Comments and Suggestions to the Author(s):

This is a nice paper which presents interesting concepts. However, it 
could be improved:

1.      Figures are too small, very hard to read
2.      Some lists like events could be put in Tables, it will 
        improve the readability of the paper

=================================================================

Parecer 2
==================================================================
A - Evaluate the PAPER QUALITIES according to the CLASSIFICATION SCALE.

CLASSIFICATION SCALE:
(4) Excelent paper (strong acceptance)
(3) Good Paper (acceptance)
(2) Regular Paper (weak acceptance)
(1)  Insuficient Paper (reject)

PAPER QUALITIES:
( 3) Originality
( 3) Relevance
( 3) Technical Quality
( 3 ) Presentation
( 3) Overal Rating

B - If the paper was rejected as a FULL PAPER, can it be accepted as a POSTER?
( ) Yes
( ) No

C - Comments and Suggestions to the Author(s):

=================================================================





